Jesus-Image Pierogi Sold!

The Jesus-Image pierogi that Michael Turton and Jim West posted about a bit ago has sold. The Associated Press reports that GoldenPalace.com, an Internet casino known for its collection of oddities, has paid $1,775 USD for the pierogi.

I wonder what it would taste like with some sour cream and onions? “Divine” I bet, or perhaps “heavenly” (haha… I kill myself!). (Just last weekend my family and I went to a friend’s for an absolutely wonderful homemade Ukrainian dinner complete with pierogies and sausage. None of them looked like anyone but perhaps the Pillsbury Dough-boy!)

What film Jesus do you think the pierogi looks like?

Filed in:

Taking Stock of My Personal Library

I now have my personal office library entered into a bibliographic management program (EndNote). My Teaching Assistant started working on it while I was on sabbatical and just finished it. Fortunately, she was one of the summer Admissions workers at Taylor and had a bit of time to work on it during office hours over the summer. I have been wanting to have an up-to-date record of my books for a while, so I am very thankful that it is now finished (of course, the challenge will be making sure to add new books to it!)

The grand total is 1748 books.

I’m not sure how this number compares with other professors of a similar stage in their career (I have been teaching full-time for eight years), but it seems like a lot. My wife says it is far too many (Having an office at work and a professional development fund to buy books with has been very very good for my marriage!), while new students always ask, “Have you read them all?” (to which I reply, “Yes, most of them twice or three times”).

There are a number of books in my library that elicit fond memories — some for sentimental reasons, some because they have been influential, and some because I bought them for a steal! The oldest book in my library (and one of the sentimental ones) is a 1879 copy of John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress and the Holy War that was my grandfather’s. One of the few books my wife has bought me is B.S. Childs’ Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments (OK, I think I may have bought it and let her wrap it up!). I also have a number of books autographed by my former professor, mentor, and friend Dr. Stanley Grenz, whose untimely death earlier this year was a great loss for the community of faith.

In regards to good deals, I first need to thank all the book review editors who have given me the opportunity to review some very expensive books for scholarly journals. Some great deals include my copy of Alfred Rahlfs’ Psalmi Cum Odis which I bought for a mere pittance at a used bookstore in Toronto, as well as a number of books which I purchased from my former professor Peter Ristau (much to the chagrin of his son, Ken Ristau, who eventually followed in his father’s footsteps — too late to get any books, however!).

My best deal — and one that I am still very proud of — is my purchase of a full set of Karl Barth’s magisterial Church Dogmatics in pristine condition. While it is now available for $500 USD in paperback from Amazon.com, I purchased my hardcover set for $200 Cdn from a pastor (which is about $166 for my American readers; ₤92 for my UK readers, and €€135 for my European readers — sorry to rub it in).

Filed in:

Who’s Your Favourite Jesus?

Who is your favourite film Jesus? The Arts & Faith website is taking a poll. So far it appears that Jim Caviezel (The Passion of the Christ, 2004) is leading the way at 28%, while Robert Powell (Jesus of Nazareth, 1977) and Enrique Irazoqui (Il Vangelo Secondo di Matteo, 1964) are close seconds at 14% and 12 %, respectively.

There are many great Jesus films and they all have different strengths and weaknesses. While I find it difficult to name a favourite screen Jesus, I would have to say that my personal favourite is probably Colin Blakeny (Son of Man, 1969). He’s not that popular in the polls however — he has a mere 2% so far.

I probably like Blakeny more because he is so atypical and off-the-wall. One of my favourite lines from Son of Man is where Blakeny’s Jesus is asked about whether or not they should pay taxes (Matt 22//Mark 12//Luke 20). He responds, “You give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar and you give to God what belongs to God — and shut up!” Another great scene is where Jesus is giving the Sermon on the Mount. The scene is hard to describe, but it brings out the shock value of Jesus’ teaching to love one’s enemies.

Update: Mark Goodacre at NT Gateway has posted some of his thoughts on his favourite Jesus. He likes Caviezel and parts of Willem Dafoe’s Jesus in Last Temptation of Christ, Jeremy Sisto’s Jesus (1999) and Ted Neeley’s Jesus Christ Superstar. I too liked Sisto and Neeley, but I found it very difficult to watch Willem Dafoe as Jesus. He just conjures up too many other roles for me to appreciate his performance (ditto for Harvey Keitel as Judas).

The LXX Psalm Superscriptions (Part 4) Situational Ascriptions

This is the fourth of a series of entries on the superscriptions in the Greek Psalter. Previous entries include “The Septuagint Psalm Superscriptions (Part 1),” “The Septuagint Psalm Superscriptions (Part 2): Personal Names and Notions of Authorship,” and “The Septuagint Psalm Superscriptions (Part 3): Liturgical Notices.”

[Note: I have removed the diacritical marks in the Greek text since it wasn’t displaying properly in some browsers.]

Situational Ascriptions in the Superscriptions

The final category that I want to discuss in this series are the additions and expansions of the situational ascriptions in the LXX Psalter. In the Hebrew Bible the situational notices relate individual psalms to some event in David’s life:

Psalm Situation Passage
3 David’s flight from Absalom 2 Sam 15-18
7 Concerning Cush, a Benjaminite (= Hushai the Archite? 2 Sam 17) ?
18 Deliverance from all his enemies and from Saul 2 Sam 22
34 Feigned madness before Abimelech 1 Sam 21:1-15
51 Nathan’s confrontation over Bathsheba 2 Sam 12
52 The betrayal of Doeg the Edomite 1 Sam 21:2-10; 22:9-10
54 The Ziphites’ betrayal of David to Saul 1 Sam 23:14-28
56 When the Philistines seized him in Gath 1 Sam 21:10-15; 27:1-12
57 Flight from Saul into the cave 1 Sam 22:1-2, 24:1-7
59 Saul’s surveillance of David’s house 1 Sam 19:11-12
60 Military victories over Aram-naharaim, Aram-zobah, and when Joab returned and struck Edom 2 Sam 8:13–14; 1 Chr 18:12–13; cf. 1 Chr 19:6
63 David in the Judean wilderness 1 Sam 23; 25; or 2 Sam 15
142 When David was in the cave 1 Sam 22:1-2, 24:1-7

While some of these superscriptions may contain a kernal of historical information, modern Psalms scholars are almost unanimous in understanding the situational superscriptions as much later additions that reflect interpretive or exegetical activity. For example, Mowinckel sees the titles as the end result of learned legends about David that associated certain psalms to specific incidents in David’s life (Sigmund Mowinckel, The Psalms in Israel’s Worship [Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1992] 2.100), while Bernhardt see these title as evidence of the first exegetical treatment of the psalms (Karl H. Bernhardt, Das Problem der altorientalischen Königsideologieim Alten Testament [Brill, 1961] 11). This midrashic understanding of the titles is also held by B.S. Childs, who argues “the Psalm titles do not appear to reflect independent historical tradition but are the result of an exegetical activity which derived its material from within the text itself” (“Psalms Titles and Midrashic Exegesis” JSS 16 [1971] 143; see also Martin Kleer, “Der Liebliche Sänger Der Psalmen Israels”: Untersuchungen Zu David Als Dichter Und Beter Der Psalmen [Bodenheim: Philo, 1996]).

David’s expanding role as the sweet psalmist of Israel continues in the LXX, with five additional psalms like to parts of David’s life. It is doubtful that the additional situational ascriptions in the psalm superscriptions are the result of the translator. This is based on what we know of translators generally; that is, that they tend to be conservative and stay pretty close to the text. More importantly, it is also supported by what is known of the translation technique of the LXX Psalter. Moreover, there is no reason to suppose that the same processes that gave rise to the situational titles in the MT Psalter would have ceased with its translation into Greek. Once the book of Psalms was translated into Greek, further midrashic activity would have occured.

The first addition is found in Ps 27(LXX 26):

Ps 27 MT לדוד Of David
4QPsr לדוד Of David
LXX 26 Του Δαυιδ, Ï€Ï?ο του χÏ?ισθηναι
Pertaining to David. Before he was annointed.

Most read the title as suggesting that this psalm was recited before David was anointed. The question remains, however, which anointing is being talked about? It could be his initial anointing by Samuel in 1 Sam 16:13, or his anointing as king over Judah in 2 Sam 2:4, or even his anointing as king over Israel in 2 Sam 5:1-6, esp. 3 (Rahlfs evidently understood the added phrase as referring to the anointing of the High Priest; most others apply the note to David [Pietersma, “Exegesis and Liturgy,” 103; Mozley, 48; Thomson and Brenton in their translation).

The early exegete Theodoret understood superscription to refer to an event prior to David’s anointing as king. He points to an association unique to the Greek translation of both סך “den, lairâ€? and ×?הל “tent” with of σκηνη — a term reserved for “tabernacle” elsewhere (Theodoret, In psalmos; cited in Rainer Stichel, “Zur Herkunft Der Psalmenüberschriften in Der Septuaginta,” in Der Septuaginta-Psalter [Herder, 2001] 149-161, p. 152). Theodoret also saw the “unjust witness” in verse 12 as an allusion to the deception of Doeg the Edomite.
Thus, while it is possible that the association could have happened on the Hebrew side of things, that it would have happened on the Greek side is clear.

Ps 93 MT
11QPsa הללויה Hallelujah
LXX 92 εις την ημεÏ?αν του Ï€Ï?οσαββατου
οτε κατωκισται η γη αινος ωδς τω Δαυιδ
For the day before the Sabbath when the land was first inhabited;
a praise song of David

There is a significant amount of textual variation in this superscription. Rather than understanding this situational ascription as connected to an event in David’s life, it more likely refers to the sixth day of creation.

Ps 96 MT
LXX 95 οτε ο οικος ωκοδομειτο μετα την αιχμαλωσιαν ωδη τω Δαυιδ
When the house was built after the captivity; a song of David

Once again there is a lot of textual instability with this superscription. While 1 Chr 16:23-33 associates this psalm with the brining of the ark into Jerusalem by David (which would be after he made himself a house), the reference to the captivity suggests the reference is to the rebuilding of the Temple in the post-exilic period. These connections could suggest the use of the psalm in a temple dedication festival (Kraus). No matter whatprompted the title, the use of οτε in the superscription suggests it is secondary.

Ps 97 MT
LXX 96 τω Δαυιδ οτε η γη αυτου καθισταται
Pertaining to David, when his land is established

While not entirely clear, this superscript may allude to the statement in 2 Samuel 7:1 that David “was settled in his palace and Yahweh had given him rest from all his enemies around him.” While there is no strong lexical links between the psalm and 2 Sam 7, the use of καθιστημι in the superscript strongly connects it with a number of psalms that speak of the establishment of David’s throne (Pss 2:6; 8:7; 18[17]:44; cf. 9:21). Noteworthy is this association is only found in the Greek text as καθιστημι is used to translate a variety of Hebrew terms. The use of οτε in the superscription suggests it is secondary.

Ps 143 MT מזמור לדוד A Psalm of David
11QPsa מזמור לדוד A Psalm of David
LXX 142 ψαλμος τω Δαυιδ οτε αυτον ο υιος καταδιωκει
A psalm, pertaining to David, when [his] son pursued him

There is some variation in the textual witnesses to this superscription; in fact many witnesses name Absalom explicitly. The reference is certainly to Absalom’s rebellion in 2 Sam 15-18 (cf. Ps 3), though what triggered the association is not as clear, though the psalm itself is a lament of an individual who is being pursued by his enemy. The use of καταδιωκω in v. 3 and the superscript identifies Absalom as the enemy. Likely secondary due to the use of οτε.

Ps 144 MT לדוד Of David
11QPsa
LXX 143 τω Δαυιδ Ï€Ï?ος τον Γολιαδ
Pertaining to David, concerning Goliath

This final addition to the situaltion ascription in the LXX Psalms connects this psalm to LXX Psalm 151. This allusion to the Goliath episode in 1 Sam 17 was more than likely triggered by the reference to the “evil sword” in verses 10-11:

εκ Ï?ομφαιας πονηÏ?ας. 11 Ï?υσαι με και εξελου με εκ χειÏ?ος υιων αλλοτÏ?ιων, ων το στομα ελαλησεν ματαιοτητα και η δεξια αυτων δεξια αδικιας.
From an evil sword Rescue me and deliver me from the hand of aliens, whose mouth spoke vanity, and whose right hand was a right hand of injustice.

The question once again is whether or not this harkens back to a Hebrew Vorlage or whether it is a Greek development. The one piece of evidence which may suggest it derives from the Greek is the transcription of Goliath’s name as Γολιαδ, and not Γολιαθ, which would be expected as the translator typically renders final tavs on names with a theta.

Conclusions

What becomes clear from examining these additional superscriptions that read the psalms in the light of David’s life, is that the exegetical activity that was started in the Hebrew tradition was continued in the Greek. This represents a further “Davidization” of the Psalter in which more psalms were read and/or prayed in association with an exemplary situation in the life of David.

This is Just Weird: Fainting Goats

My older brother sent me this link about Fainting Goats. I’m not sure how it relates to the Bible or religion (I know what you’re thinking: “How does most of what you blog on relate to Bible or religion!”), but it’s worth a look.

Hey… I know how it relates: Many ancient scrolls were written on goat skin — just think how easy it would be to sacrifice one of these critters! They would fall down as you approach them!

Filed in:

Pasolini’s The Gospel According to St. Matthew Screening in Edmonton

There will be a screening of Pier Paolo Pasolini’s Il Vangelo secondo Matteo (The Gospel According to St. Matthew) this Saturday 13 August 2005 at 2:00 pm as part of the Italian Film Festival. The Screening will take place in the Zeidler Hall – main floor of the Citadel Theatre Complex (9828-101A Avenue). Tickets for adults are $8 and are available half an hour before the show.

Many consider this film to be one of the best Jesus films produced. I have previously blogged on it here. I highly recommend Pasolini’s The Gospel According to St. Matthew. If you live in the Edmonton area, you should take advantage of this showing and see it on the big screen!

The film is available in both DVD (Buy from Amazon.ca | Buy from Amazon.com) and VHS format (Buy from Amazon.ca | Buy from Amazon.com).

Filed in:

Where Books Do In Fact Go…

It started with an innocent blog entry on my messy desk. That spawned a series of bloggers showing their messy desks (except Jim West — his desk is very, very, clean). Then Michael Bird brought it all to a head with a picture of his interim office (or should I say, “brought it all to the head”). Now Edmund Fearon has connected all of the dots with his post on whether or not it is appropriate to read in the bathroom (“where books should not go…”). He thinks not: “taking a book into the bathroom to read as you do your business is simply wrong!”

I must beg to differ. I confess. I read in the bathroom. It’s not as if I take a volume of Barth’s Church Dogmatics in there to peruse. But I do take books that I am skimming for various reasons. I refer to these books affectionately as my “bathroom books.” Currently, in the upstairs ensuite I am looking at Consuming Religion: Christian Faith and Practice in a Consumer Culture by Vincent J. Miller, while on the main floor I have a collection of English essays and various journals and newspapers.

I don’t know why I do it… well, actually I do know why. I hate to waste time. The same thing that motivates me to do some light reading in the potty also compels me to read while walking home from work (so far I have not walked into any posts!).

So there you have it. Does anyone want to borrow a book?

Filed in:

Amazing Archaeological Discovery: Garden of Eden Found!

I was at the local 7/11 (thank heaven) earlier today refilling one of those DoubleGulp cups that litter my office and was amazed to find out from the cover of this week’s World Weekly News that the Garden of Eden has been Found! They claim that the garden is at the bottom of the Persian Gulf, which is ridiculous since we know from reading the Bible that Eden would be a mountaintop garden since four rivers found their source within it! Duh!

What I find really confusing is that while the story is on the cover of this week’s issue, the online version says it was published 02/12/2001?! Was it just found or was it four years ago? Talk about shoddy reporting! Can’t trust nobody! (And unfortunately there is no ‘Atiqot or IAA report on this exciting discovery!)

Filed in: